Grant Intelligence for Transportation Professionals
How California Transportation Funding Really Works
5
Funding layers
STIP
State program cycle
FTIP
Regional listing gate
E-76
Federal obligation
The Big Picture

Five Layers of Government, One Project

Transportation funding flows through five distinct layers before reaching a local agency project. Each layer adds rules, timelines, and compliance requirements. The layer a dollar came from determines what strings are attached — federal strings (DBE, Davis-Bacon, NEPA, E-76), state strings (CTC allocation, CEQA, Caltrans oversight), or none at all (local sales tax).

$55.7B
FY2025 federal highway apportionment nationally
IIJA/BIL · ~$4.4B to California
~$5B
Annual SB 1 new state transportation revenue
Gas tax + vehicle reg fee · Since 2017
$820M
Bay Area OBAG 4 total, FFY27–30
MTC · Adopted Jan 2026
~$95M
New Bay Area STIP capacity, 2026 cycle
MTC RTIP · Dec 2025
$300M
HSIP Cycle 12 statewide (288 projects)
Caltrans DLA · Feb 2025
$1B
SS4A annual funding, FY22–26
USDOT direct to city
LayerInstitutionWhat It DoesKey ProgramsHow City Accesses
1 · FederalFHWA / FTA / NHTSAAuthorizes, apportions, and awards competitive grants. Sets all compliance rules (DBE, Buy America, Davis-Bacon, NEPA).NHPP, STBG, HSIP, CMAQ, SS4A, BUILD, INFRA, PROTECT, CRP, ATTAINFormula: via Caltrans/MTC/CMA. Competitive: direct Grants.gov application
2 · StateCTC / Caltrans / OTSAdministers federal passthrough and state programs. CTC allocates capital funds by formal vote. Caltrans processes E-76 and manages delivery oversight.STIP, SHOPP, ATP, HSIP (admin), SB 1 programs, OTS grants, STPGCompetitive grants via Caltrans NOFA + CTC adoption. LSRP: direct monthly State Controller deposit.
3 · Regional MPOMTCSuballocates federal formula funds, maintains the FTIP, adopts the RTP (Plan Bay Area), manages regional competitive programs.OBAG 4, ATP MPO, TDA Art. 3, TPI, CARE, STIP RTIPVia CMA (formula suballocation) or direct MTC application
4 · County CMACCTA, ACTC, VTA, othersSub-programs OBAG/RSTP/CMAQ; administers local sales tax; compiles STIP nominations; maintains Countywide Transportation Plan and Comprehensive Transportation Project List; serves as FTIP gateway for city projects.RSTP, CMAQ, OBAG county share, Measure J/BB, TFCA, TDA Art. 3, STIP nominationsCMA call for projects (periodic). RSTP: annual coordination. Sales tax: separate cycle.
5 · Local AgencyCity / CountyProject sponsor, grant applicant, and delivery agency. Projects must appear in both the CMA/county plans and the FTIP before federal funds can be obligated.All above as recipientApply → Award → FTIP listing → E-76 → Procure → Build → Invoice → Reimburse
🚨

The One Rule That Cannot Be Broken

Never incur a cost you expect to be reimbursed with federal funds before the E-76 authorization date. Pre-authorization costs are permanently ineligible — no exceptions, no retroactive authorization. See the E-76 & Delivery tab for the complete sequence.

Layer 1 · Federal Programs

Federal Programs — FHWA / FTA / NHTSA

Federal transportation money arrives in two forms: formula apportionments distributed to states annually by statutory formula — predictable, lower overhead, but require FTIP listing and E-76 — and discretionary grants awarded through competitive NOFOs, often direct to local agencies, with larger award sizes and higher compliance overhead. Both require FTIP listing before any costs can be incurred.

Formula Programs — Apportioned to California Every Fiscal Year

FHWA · Formula · 23 U.S.C. §119
Largest federal highway program (~$29.6B/yr nationally, ~$1.9B to CA). Funds the National Highway System — interstates, US routes, and major state routes. Primarily Caltrans-delivered. Local agencies access when their project is on an NHS-designated route. Administered via Caltrans Local Assistance.
Formula~$1.9B CA/yr80/20NHS routes
FHWA · Formula · Suballocated to MPO/CMA
Most flexible federal program. Suballocated by MTC to CMAs as the Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP). Cities receive an annual formula allocation — no competitive application. Eligible for nearly anything: local streets, transit, bike/ped, ITS, planning. Coordinate with your CMA to program projects into the FTIP.
Formula~$1.1B CA/yr88.53/11.47Via CMA — no competition
FHWA → Caltrans · Annual Call for Projects
Formula safety funds for infrastructure on all public roads, administered by Caltrans Division of Local Assistance. Scored primarily on BCR, crash data, and alignment with the SHSP. Cycle 12: 288 projects, $299.6M awarded statewide. Cycle 13 expected late 2026 or early 2027. An adopted CSAP qualifies as the required Local Road Safety Plan equivalent.
Formula + Competitive~$300M/cycle90/10Cycle 13 ~ Late 2026
FHWA · Formula · Nonattainment Areas
Formula funds for projects that reduce transportation emissions in EPA nonattainment and maintenance areas — the Bay Area qualifies on both ozone and PM2.5. FHWA apportions to Caltrans → MTC → CMA call for projects. Applications must demonstrate quantified air quality benefit (tons/day NOx, ROG, PM2.5). Eligible: adaptive signals, transit, bike/ped, TDM, EV charging.
Formula~$320M CA/yr80/20Via MTC → CMA
FHWA · Formula · New under IIJA
New IIJA formula program for projects reducing carbon emissions from the transportation sector. California must maintain an adopted statewide Carbon Reduction Strategy. Suballocated to MPOs and CMAs. Eligible: signal optimization, active transportation, transit, car-sharing, TDM, EV infrastructure.
Formula~$180M CA/yr80/20Via MTC → CMA
FHWA · Formula · New under IIJA
Formula resilience funds for climate adaptation of surface transportation — raising bridges, improving drainage, culvert replacement, flood mitigation, wildfire risk reduction. Suballocated through Caltrans and MPOs. Separate from the competitive PROTECT Discretionary grant, though both are funded under IIJA.
Formula~$80M CA/yr80/20Via Caltrans/MPO

Discretionary Grants — National Competition, Often Direct to City

USDOT · Direct to City · Annual NOFO
Planning ($100K–$5M) and Implementation ($2M–$25M) grants tied to a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP). Implementation requires an adopted CSAP. USDOT awards directly — no state intermediary. Must list project in the FTIP post-award and obtain E-76 through Caltrans Local Assistance. Scored heavily on equity (CalEnviroScreen DAC), Safe System alignment, and BCR. FY2026 due May 26, 2026.
Competitive · Direct$1B/yr80/20Due May 26, 2026
USDOT · Direct · Annual NOFO (formerly RAISE)
Capital and planning grants for multimodal projects with significant local or regional impact. Renamed RAISE → BUILD under the current administration. FY2026: $1.5B. Urban: $5M–$25M per award. Scored on safety, equity, environmental sustainability, economic competitiveness, and innovation. FY2026 deadline was February 24, 2026 — watch for FY2027.
Competitive · Direct$1.5B FY2680/20FY26 Closed
USDOT/FHWA · Combined MPDG Application
Three programs in one combined application: INFRA (~$1.6B/yr, nationally significant freight/highway), Mega (large complex projects $500M+), Rural (surface transportation in rural areas). INFRA federal match: 80% for small projects, 60% for large. Benefit-cost analysis required. Local agencies apply directly to FHWA. Caltrans acts as pass-through via Sub-recipient Agreement. FY2026 NOFO not yet released as of April 2026.
Competitive · Direct$2.7B+ combined60–80% federalFY26 NOFO Pending
FHWA · Competitive · Periodic NOFO
Competitive resilience grants separate from the formula PROTECT allocation. $250M/yr for projects that address climate change and natural disaster risk to surface transportation. Check the FHWA PROTECT page for upcoming NOFO release timing. Eligibility and match rates mirror the formula program.
Competitive · Direct$250M/yr80/20Check FHWA
FHWA · Competitive · Periodic NOFO (Renamed ATTAIN under IIJA)
Formerly called ATCMTD — renamed ATTAIN under IIJA. Competitive grants for large-scale deployment of advanced transportation technologies: adaptive signal control, connected/automated vehicle infrastructure (C-V2X), TMC upgrades, AI traffic management, ATSPM data systems. Requires 50% local match. FHWA strongly prefers regional consortia over single-city deployments. Check FHWA Office of Operations for NOFO timing.
Competitive · Direct~$60M/cycle50/50 matchPeriodic NOFO
FHWA · Competitive · Periodic NOFO
Competitive grants to reduce the number of bridges in poor or at-risk condition. Local agencies are eligible as direct recipients — a notable change from prior bridge programs. Focused on repair, rehabilitation, or replacement of existing bridges on public roads. Separate from the Bridge Formula Program (which is formula-based and flows through Caltrans). Check FHWA BIP page for NOFO timing.
Competitive~$300M/yr80/20Check FHWA
USDOT · Competitive · New under IIJA
Grants to reconnect communities physically divided by past highway or transportation infrastructure. Planning grants (up to $2M) and capital grants ($5M–$30M). Projects may involve removing, retrofitting, or capping barrier infrastructure, improving cross-barrier access, and prioritizing historically underserved communities. Annual NOFO via Grants.gov.
Competitive · Direct~$200M/yr80/20Annual NOFO
NHTSA → California OTS · Annual NOFA
NHTSA behavioral safety programs administered by California's Office of Traffic Safety. §402: DUI, speed, distracted driving enforcement and education. §405 sub-programs cover impaired driving (405d), occupant protection (405b), traffic records (405c), motorcycles (405f), and pedestrian/cyclist safety (405h). §405h — created by IIJA — allows limited engineering activities on high-risk corridors, unlike the other 405 programs. 100% federal, no match. OTS ranks cities by collision rate within population peer groups. Applications due January–February for the October 1 fiscal year start.
NHTSA → OTS~$120M CA/yr100% federalJan–Feb application
Layer 2 · State Programs

State Programs — CTC / Caltrans / OTS / CalSTA

Two institutions control state transportation capital funding with distinct but complementary roles. CTC programs and formally allocates funds through bimonthly votes — without a CTC allocation, no state funds can be spent. Caltrans administers programs day-to-day, processes E-76 authorizations, and provides delivery oversight. Both are required for most capital projects; missing either step stops the money.

CTC Capital Programs

State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)

CTC · Biennial 5-year capital program · State + Federal funds blended
State + Federal~$3B/5yr cycle2026 STIP: March 2026

The STIP is CTC's biennial 5-year capital program, blending state gas tax (Transportation Investment Fund), SB 1 revenue (RMRA), and federal STBG funds. The 75% regional share is distributed to counties by formula through CMAs and RTIPs; the 25% interregional share (ITIP) is controlled by Caltrans for state highway or intercity projects.

Path to entry: Complete a Project Study Report (PSR) → CMA nomination (Sept–Oct of odd years) → CMA submits to MTC → MTC adopts Bay Area RTIP (December) → CTC holds hearings and adopts STIP (March of even years) → submit Allocation Request per phase → CTC votes → E-76 if federal funds are included.

2026 STIP: MTC adopted the 2026 RTIP at its December 17, 2025 meeting, providing ~$95M in new Bay Area programming capacity. CTC adoption targeted March 19, 2026. See the STIP & TIP tab for the complete cycle timeline.

SHOPP — State Highway Operation & Protection Program

CTC · Biennial · Caltrans-delivered · State Hwy System only
Caltrans-Delivered$21.2B FY24–28

SHOPP funds maintenance and protection of the state-owned highway system. Local agencies do not apply — Caltrans selects projects based on asset condition data and submits to CTC for adoption. Local agency relevance: (1) Advocate to your Caltrans District for SHOPP attention on state routes through your city. (2) Contribute local funds via a Financial Contribution Only (FCO) mechanism to have Caltrans-delivered SHOPP work incorporate local needs. (3) Understand SHOPP project schedules when your projects involve state highway intersections or connections — SHOPP construction windows can create or eliminate opportunities for coordination.

Active Transportation Program (ATP)

Caltrans / CTC · Biennial Competitive · Federal TAP + State SHA
State + Fed TAP~$440M/cycleNo match requiredCycle 8 ~ March 2026

ATP is California's consolidated program for biking, walking, Safe Routes to School, and multimodal infrastructure. Funded by the federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) set-aside plus State Highway Account revenues. Administered by Caltrans ATP Division; formally allocated by CTC.

Three competition tiers:

  • Statewide (40%): Highly competitive. Favors transformative projects with strong DAC equity scores. Projects in CalEnviroScreen top 25% have a decisive scoring advantage.
  • Large MPO / MTC (40%): Bay Area agencies compete here. MTC scores applications and recommends a program of projects to CTC. Better odds for projects under ~$5M than competing statewide.
  • Small Urban & Rural (20%): For jurisdictions under 200,000 population.

Showing local match improves score but is not required. CEQA progress directly translates to readiness points. Cycle 8 expected to open March 2026.

SB 1 Programs — Road Repair & Accountability Act (2017)

SB 1 generates ~$5B/year in new state transportation revenue from the gas excise tax, vehicle registration fees, and diesel taxes. It created or expanded six programs through CTC. LSRP is the only one that bypasses CTC entirely — deposited directly by the State Controller into city accounts monthly with no programming step required.

State Controller · Direct Formula · No Application
~$1.5B/yr distributed monthly by the State Controller directly to cities and counties by population/road-mile formula. No application, no CTC programming, no federal strings. Annual requirements: adopt project list at a public Council meeting, post the list online, submit expenditure report to CTC by December 1, and certify Maintenance of Effort (MOE). Can be used as local match for federal grants — LSRP is often the most efficient match source available.
Direct Monthly~$1.5B/yr statewideNo match · No federal strings
CTC · Formula ($100M) + Competitive ($100M)
Rewards agencies with voter-approved sales tax or transportation fees (Measure J, BB, etc.). Formulaic LPP (~$100M/yr): automatically distributed by CTC based on local revenue generated — no competitive application needed. Competitive LPP (~$100M/yr): project-specific applications scored by CTC, due November of even years. Confirm your agency's eligibility with your CMA. CTC distributes the formulaic share annually.
Formula + Competitive$200M/yrCompetitive: Nov deadline
CTC · Biennial Competitive · $250M/yr
Competitive grants for multimodal corridor-level projects that achieve a balanced set of transportation, environmental, and community access improvements within heavily congested corridors. Projects must be part of a comprehensive corridor plan. Joint nominations with Caltrans unlock additional scoring weight and the Caltrans nomination pot. Biennial cycles (2020, 2022, 2024 completed). Watch for 2026 cycle NOFA — applications typically due to CTC in November.
Competitive$250M/yrNo match required2026 cycle expected
CTC · Biennial · State TCEA + Federal NHFP
State TCEA funds plus federal National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) for freight infrastructure on high-volume trade corridors. Two nomination paths: Caltrans pot (joint Caltrans-local nomination) and Regional pot (via MPO). Bay Area agencies submit through MTC, which compiles and endorses nominations to CTC. Applications due to CTC in November of even years. Eligible: grade separations, freight ITS, port access, zero-emission truck infrastructure. Match at 30% is encouraged.
State + Fed NHFP~$300M+/yr30% match encouraged2026 cycle expected
CalSTA · Competitive · Cap-and-Trade + SB 1
~$700M/yr for capital projects modernizing California rail, bus, and ferry transit to reduce GHG and VMT. Administered by CalSTA. Funded by SB 1 and cap-and-trade auction proceeds. Primary applicants are transit operators and rail agencies. City path: partner with BART, County Connection, or other transit operators on applications that include multimodal station access, bus rapid transit on city streets, or last-mile infrastructure on city right-of-way.
State + Cap+Trade~$700M/yrTransit operators lead
Caltrans DTP · Annual NOFA · Planning only
~$34.5M/yr for transportation planning projects. Two components: Sustainable Communities Grants (VMT reduction, equity, climate action) and Strategic Partnerships Grants (multiagency coordination). Eligible: CSAPs, ATPs, General Plan Mobility Elements, VMT reduction studies, corridor feasibility studies. FY26-27 cycle closed November 2025. FY27-28 call expected September 2026. Match: 11.47–20% (staff time at burdened rate is acceptable).
State + Fed PL$34.5M/yr11.47–20% matchFY27-28 ~ Sept 2026
Layer 3 · Regional

Regional Programs — MTC as Bay Area MPO

MTC is the federally designated MPO for the 9-county Bay Area, the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) under California law, and the designated recipient for several federal formula suballocations. Its three core planning functions — the RTP (Plan Bay Area), the TIP/FTIP, and the RTIP — each directly control a city's access to transportation funding. Understanding how these three documents interact is essential for any engineer working on capital project delivery.

🏠

OBAG Housing Requirement — Enforced, Not Advisory

Cities must demonstrate good-faith RHNA compliance to participate in OBAG 4. Non-compliance can result in withholding of your entire county OBAG allocation. Verify your status with your CMA annually. Details: MTC OBAG 4 housing requirements.

MTC → CMA · 4-Year Cycle · Adopted Jan 2026
$820M in federal STBG + CMAQ funds for FFY27–30. MTC distributes county shares to CMAs, which run their own calls for projects. Cities apply to their county CMA's OBAG program. Eligible: local streets, safety, complete streets, PDA investments, bike/ped, transit. Must be in Plan Bay Area. 11.47% local match. Housing RHNA compliance required and enforced.
MTC → CMA → City$820M FFY27–3011.47% matchOBAG 4 Active
MTC via CMAs · Annual · No Match
Transportation Development Act Article 3 funds dedicated to bike/ped infrastructure. Distributed by MTC through each county CMA annually. Bay Area share ~$12M/year. No local match required. Apply to your county CMA — simpler process than ATP or OBAG. Eligible: Class I–IV bikeways, sidewalk gap closures, crosswalk improvements, ADA ramps, trail connections. Chronically underutilized by cities that aren't tracking it.
MTC → CMA → City~$12M Bay Area/yrNo matchAnnual
Bay Area Air District → CMA → City
Funded by a $4/vehicle registration surcharge collected by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Split: 40% County Program (administered by each CMA as County Program Manager), 60% Regional Program (competitive via BAAQMD). Eligible: trip reduction, alternative fuels, EV charging, bicycle infrastructure, clean transit, car-sharing. CCTA is County Program Manager for Contra Costa; ACTC for Alameda. No match typically required.
BAAQMD → CMA → City$20M+ Bay Area/yrNo match typically
MTC · LCTOP/Cap-and-Trade · Periodic
MTC competitive grants for transit corridor speed and reliability improvements using LCTOP (Low Carbon Transit Operations Program) cap-and-trade proceeds. Transit operators are primary applicants. City path: partner with your transit agency for transit signal priority (TSP) or bus stop improvements requiring city right-of-way coordination. Check MTC Funding Opportunities for active calls.
MTC · LCTOPVaries by cycleTransit operators lead
MTC · Community-Based · Periodic
MTC grants for community-based organizations supporting housing and transportation equity — participatory budgeting, technical assistance, community engagement for transportation plans. ~$1.3M per cycle. Primary applicants are CBOs and nonprofits. City path: partner with CBOs to support community engagement components of larger transportation plans, with CBO as lead applicant. Check MTC funding page for active cycles.
MTC · CBO Lead~$1.3M/cycleCBO as lead
Layer 4 · County CMAs & Planning Programs

The CMA Layer: Plans, Programming,
and the Path to Funding

CMAs are where regional planning meets local project delivery. They maintain the countywide transportation planning documents that determine which projects are eligible for state and federal funds, operate the programming documents that get projects into the funding pipeline, and serve as the administrative gateway for FTIP amendments. For most local agency engineers, the CMA is the most consequential relationship in transportation funding.

The Planning Document Hierarchy: From Vision to FTIP

Every project that uses state or federal transportation funds must trace a lineage through a stack of adopted planning documents — from the 25-year regional vision down to a specific project entry in the FTIP. A project that doesn't appear in these documents is ineligible for most funding programs, regardless of how well it scores on any other criterion. Here's how the documents nest together in the Bay Area:

25-Year Vision · MTC + ABAG
Bay Area Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy. Adopted jointly by MTC and ABAG. Projects needing STIP, OBAG, or ATP funds must be consistent with this plan. Updated every 4–5 years.
Long-Range County Plan · CMA
Each CMA maintains a CTP (20–25 year horizon) that identifies countywide transportation priorities. Projects in the CTP are consistent with the RTP and serve as the basis for STIP nominations and CMA funding calls. CCTA's CTP update is underway; draft expected 2026.
Near-Term Capital List · CMA
The CTPL (CCTA maintains one with 1,200+ projects) is the operational database of projects eligible for CMA programming. A project must be in the CTPL to be nominated for STIP or included in CMA calls for projects. Cities submit projects for inclusion — this is the first actionable step.
State Capital Program · CTC
CMA assembles RTIP nominations from cities and submits to MTC → CTC adopts the STIP. Projects in the STIP are formally programmed with state and/or federal funds. CTC allocation by phase is still required before spending.
4-Year Federal Program · MTC
MTC's 4-year program of all projects expecting federal action or funding in the Bay Area. The TIP is adopted by MTC and forwarded to Caltrans for inclusion in the Statewide FTIP. MTC forwards to Caltrans within 30 days of adoption.
Federal Gate · FHWA/FTA Approved
The FTIP is MTC's TIP after FHWA and FTA approval — the legally operative document. A project must be in the FTIP before E-76 can be filed. No FTIP listing = no federal obligation = no federal reimbursement.

How a Project Moves from RTIP → TIP → FTIP

In the Bay Area, MTC uses one document — the TIP — to serve as both the state RTIP (required by California Government Code) and the federal TIP (required by 23 CFR Part 450). When MTC adopts the TIP, it simultaneously constitutes the Bay Area's RTIP submission to CTC and the draft FTIP submission to FHWA and FTA. Here's the sequence from city project to obligated federal funds:

1
City submits project to CMA with scope, cost, schedule, fund source, and phase. For STIP projects, a completed PSR is required. For OBAG/RSTP/CMAQ, a project description is sufficient.
2
CMA programs the project into its internal programming system (CCTA uses CTIPS, Caltrans' California Transportation Improvement Program System). CMA Board votes to include it in their programming cycle. The project now has a committed fund source, phase, programmed year, and cost estimate.
3
MTC enters the project in the TIP via an amendment. MTC's TIP/FTIP database is the Fund Management System (FMS). All project data — fund code, federal amount, phase, fiscal year, project description — is entered here. MTC adopts TIP amendments at scheduled Commission meetings.
4
MTC forwards the adopted TIP to Caltrans for inclusion in the Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP) by reference. MTC forwarded the 2025 TIP to Caltrans, which incorporated it into the statewide FSTIP. The State approves the FSTIP, then forwards to FHWA and FTA for federal approval.
5
FHWA and FTA approve the FSTIP — at this point, MTC's TIP becomes the legally operative FTIP. The 2025 FSTIP was approved by FHWA/FTA on December 16, 2024. Projects now listed in the FTIP are eligible for E-76 authorization.
6
City files for E-76 through Caltrans District Local Assistance. E-76 is the federal authorization to incur costs against the obligated funds. This is the last gate before construction can begin.

Note: The MTC TIP is updated continually through amendments. New projects, cost changes, phase changes, and fund code swaps all require TIP amendments — see amendment types and timelines in the STIP & TIP tab.

Countywide Programs Your City Should Be Actively Participating In

Beyond submitting individual grant applications, cities should be enrolled in standing CMA programs that flow funds automatically or require minimal applications. Many cities leave money on the table by not maintaining active participation in these programs. Below are the programs organized by urgency:

🔴 Comprehensive Transportation Project List (CTPL)

Your projects must be in the CCTA CTPL (or equivalent for your county) to be nominated for STIP or included in CMA calls. Contact your CMA to register projects. Entry is free and non-competitive — there's no reason not to be in it. Update project data annually as costs and schedules evolve.

🔴 Plan Bay Area Consistency

Major capital projects must be consistent with Plan Bay Area (RTP/SCS) to access STIP, OBAG, and ATP funds. Regionally significant projects (typically $250M+) must be explicitly listed. Coordinate with your CMA during RTP update cycles to ensure your priority projects are included.

🔴 RSTP Annual Coordination

Your city has an annual RSTP formula allocation — you must coordinate with your CMA to program specific projects into the FTIP to access it. Don't let your RSTP accumulate without obligation. Unobligated funds lapse after 3 years. Work with your CMA to maintain a rolling 3-year RSTP project queue.

🔴 SB 1 LSRP Annual Reporting

Adopt your project list at a public City Council meeting, post it online, and submit the expenditure report to CTC by December 1 every year. Failure to submit forfeits the following year's allocation. Certify your Maintenance of Effort simultaneously.

🟢 CMA OBAG Call for Projects

Participate in every OBAG call your CMA runs. Verify RHNA housing compliance annually. OBAG is one of the largest local agency funding pools in the Bay Area and cities that don't actively apply leave significant federal funds to neighboring jurisdictions.

🟢 LPP Formulaic Share

If your county has a voter-approved sales tax measure (Measure J, BB, etc.), your city likely qualifies for the SB 1 LPP formulaic share. Check with your CMA annually that your city's share is being claimed and programmed. This is formula money — it doesn't require competing, just claiming.

🟢 CMAQ Call for Projects

Your CMA holds periodic CMAQ calls. Prepare quantified emissions benefit documentation for eligible projects (adaptive signals, TDM, bike/ped) and apply every cycle. CMAQ funds do not carry the same competitive intensity as HSIP or ATP — a well-prepared application usually succeeds.

🟢 TDA Article 3 (Annual Bike/Ped)

Contact your CMA about your annual TDA Article 3 allocation. This is ~$12M distributed across the Bay Area annually for bike/ped projects with no match required. Many cities don't track this separately from OBAG and miss the annual cycle entirely.

🟢 Measure J / BB Return-to-Source

18% of Measure J (Contra Costa) is returned automatically to jurisdictions by population formula — no application needed. Track this as a budget line item in your CIP. Compliance with the Growth Management Program is required to receive it.

🟡 TFCA County Program

Your CMA runs the TFCA county program cycle annually. Apply with clean transportation, EV, bike, or trip reduction projects. No federal strings, generally no match. An underutilized fund especially relevant for cities with EV infrastructure or active transportation needs.

🟡 Growth Management Program (GMP) Compliance

Contra Costa cities must maintain GMP compliance to receive Measure J return-to-source and competitive capital funds. GMP requires: adopted General Plan, Capital Improvement Program, Urban Limit Line, transportation demand management ordinance, and housing program. Verify compliance status annually with CCTA.

🟡 Countywide Plans — Advocacy Phase

Participate in CMA plan update processes (CTP update, Plan Bay Area update, CTPL submissions). This is when you shape the universe of projects that are eligible for future funding cycles. Projects that miss these windows often wait years before they can access competitive funding.

Bay Area County CMAs — Programs & Contacts

Contra Costa County · ccta.net
CMA for Contra Costa County. Administers Measure J (half-cent sales tax through 2034), programs OBAG 4 county share, distributes RSTP formula, manages TFCA County Program, and compiles STIP nominations via MTC. Maintains the Comprehensive Transportation Project List (CTPL) — 1,200+ projects. The Growth Management Program compliance is required for Measure J funds. See CCTA funding page.
Measure JOBAG 4RSTP/CMAQTFCACTPL
Alameda County · alamedactc.org
Dual role: CMA and sales tax agency. Administers Measure BB and older Measure B. Programs OBAG 4, RSTP, CMAQ. Runs SRTS mini-grants, Access for All WAV grants, and the Comprehensive Investment Plan. TFCA County Program Manager for Alameda.
Measure BBMeasure BSRTS mini-grantsOBAG 4
Santa Clara County · vta.org
CMA for Santa Clara County. Administers 2016 Measure B bike/ped competitive grants, OBAG 4 county share (~$81M), TDA Article 3, and CARE program coordination. Also a major transit operator. See VTA Grants page.
Measure BOBAG 4 ~$81MTDA Art. 3
Marin County · tam.ca.gov
CMA for Marin County. Administers Measure AA and older Measure A. Runs OBAG, Safe Pathways grants, and countywide bike/ped and crosswalk safety programs. TFCA County Program Manager for Marin.
Measure AAMeasure ASafe Pathways
Solano County · sta.ca.gov
CMA for Solano County. Administers Measure T and OBAG. Programs local road maintenance, safety, and active transportation. TFCA County Program Manager for Solano. See STA funding page.
Measure TOBAGTFCA
Napa County · nvta.ca.gov
CMA for Napa County. Administers Measure T, OBAG, and TFCA programs. Programs local road safety and active transportation. See NVTA programs page.
Measure TTFCAOBAG
San Francisco · sfcta.org
CMA for San Francisco. Administers Prop K, Prop L sales taxes, OBAG, and the Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP). Manages Vision Zero capital program funding in partnership with SFMTA. TFCA County Program Manager for SF.
Prop KProp LNTIPVision Zero
San Mateo County · smcta.com · ccag.net
Dual structure: SMCTA (sales tax authority) and C/CAG (CMA). Administers Measure A and Measure W, OBAG, bike/ped grants, and shuttle programs. TFCA County Program Manager for San Mateo. See SMCTA grants page.
Measure AMeasure WBike/Ped grants
The Funding Machine

How Transportation Dollars Flow — Origin to Project

Every dollar traces back to one of three origins: the federal Highway Trust Fund, California's SB 1 state revenues, or a voter-approved local sales tax. The path from origin to your project account determines compliance requirements, cash flow implications, and delivery timeline. Here are the three tracks in detail.

Track 1 — Federal Highway Trust Fund → Formula Programs

Origin · U.S. Federal Government

Highway Trust Fund — Gas & Diesel Taxes

18.4¢/gal federal gas tax + 24.4¢/gal diesel → Highway Trust Fund. IIJA authorizes $55.7B for FY25. HTF is structurally underfunded — IIJA included a $118B General Fund backstop through FY26. This is why IIJA reauthorization in 2026 is consequential for California's ~$4.4B annual apportionment.

18.4¢ gas tax24.4¢ diesel$55.7B national FY25~$4.4B to California
Oct 1 each FY: FHWA publishes Certificate of Apportionment — the legal authorization to obligate
Step 1 · FHWA Apportionment

FHWA Calculates California's Share by Statutory Formula

California's initial share is proportional to its FY2021 share of national apportionments. Two minimums then apply: (1) each state receives at least 95¢ for every dollar its drivers paid in federal fuel taxes, and (2) each state's apportionment grows at least 1% per year from prior year. California's total is then divided among 8 core programs by their own sub-formulas.

NHPP: ~$1.9BSTBG: ~$1.1BHSIP: ~$400MCMAQ: ~$320MCRP: ~$180M
STBG and CMAQ must be suballocated to MPOs for urbanized areas over 200K
Step 2 · Caltrans as State DOT

Caltrans Receives All Apportionments

FHWA apportions to Caltrans as California's State DOT. Caltrans retains NHPP (state hwy system). STBG and CMAQ are suballocated to MTC for the Bay Area urbanized area. Caltrans tracks the 3-year obligation window — funds lapse if unobligated by the end of the third fiscal year after apportionment.

STBG + CMAQ → MTC for Bay Area urbanized area suballocation
Step 3 · MTC Programs Regionally

MTC Blends into OBAG and Programs County Shares

MTC blends STBG + CMAQ into OBAG 4 and distributes county shares to CMAs. All projects using these funds must be listed in the FTIP — MTC's Fund Management System is the official record. MTC adopts TIP amendments at scheduled Commission meetings.

CMAs receive county OBAG share; distribute RSTP by formula; run CMAQ calls
Step 4 · CMA to City

CMA Distributes RSTP Formula + Runs CMAQ/OBAG Calls

CCTA / ACTC receive county allocations. RSTP is distributed by lane-mile/VMT formula — no competition. CMAQ requires a city application with quantified air quality benefit. CMA Board votes to approve project lists. CMA then processes FTIP amendment requests to list approved projects before E-76 can be filed.

FTIP listing confirmed → Caltrans processes E-76 → City can incur reimbursable costs
Step 5 · Local Agency

City Pays First, Then Invoices Caltrans Local Assistance

City pays contractors from its own accounts. Submits invoices to Caltrans Local Assistance with certified payrolls, DBE documentation, and paid invoices. Net reimbursement timeline: 60–120 days from city payment. Obligated funds must be expended within 3 years from the FY of apportionment or they lapse.

E-76 before any costsDBE · Buy America · Davis-BaconInvoice → Caltrans LA60–120 day reimbursement lag

Track 2 — SB 1 State Revenue: Direct vs. CTC Paths

📌

LSRP Is Direct — Everything Else Requires CTC Allocation

The Local Streets & Roads Program bypasses CTC entirely — the State Controller deposits funds monthly into city accounts. All other SB 1 programs (LPP, SCCP, TCEP, STIP augmentation) require a CTC programming action and a formal allocation vote before a single dollar can be spent. CTC meets 6 times per year; plan your phase milestones around the CTC meeting calendar.

Track 3 — Discretionary Federal Grants: "Direct" Means the Award, Not the Compliance

SS4A, BUILD, INFRA — Award Is Direct; Everything Else Is Identical

When USDOT awards a grant directly to a city, it skips the Caltrans/CMA programming step for the award itself. But post-award, the city must still: (1) list the project in the FTIP via its CMA and MTC, (2) execute a Grant Agreement with USDOT, (3) obtain E-76 through Caltrans Local Assistance, and (4) follow all federal procurement rules (DBE, Buy America, Davis-Bacon, 2 CFR 200). The FTIP amendment alone can take 60–90 days — build this into the project schedule from day one of the award.

Programming Mechanics

STIP & FTIP: The Two Documents Every Capital Project Must Navigate

The STIP is CTC's biennial 5-year capital program. The FTIP is the federally-approved list of every project using any federal funds in the Bay Area — maintained by MTC, approved by FHWA and FTA. In the Bay Area, MTC's TIP serves as both documents simultaneously. Neither has shortcuts: miss a step and the project waits for the next cycle.

The STIP Biennial Cycle

June · Odd Year
Draft Fund Estimate
CTC/Caltrans calculate new programming capacity. Sets the budget ceiling for the cycle.
August · Odd Year
CTC Adopts Fund Estimate + Guidelines
CTC sets the cap and adopts STIP guidelines. Agencies know available capacity.
Sept–Oct · Odd Year
CMA Nominations Due
Cities submit nominations with completed PSR to CMA. CMA Board votes and submits to MTC.
Dec 1 · Odd Year
RTIPs Due to CTC
MTC adopts Bay Area RTIP and submits to CTC. Caltrans submits ITIP (25% interregional share).
Jan–Feb · Even Year
CTC Hearings
Two public hearings — N. CA and S. CA. Agencies can testify in support of their projects.
March · Even Year
STIP Adopted
CTC formal vote. Projects are programmed. 2026 STIP: March 19, 2026.
Ongoing
Allocation Requests
Projects request CTC allocation per phase (PA&ED, PS&E, CON). 6 CTC meetings/year.

Getting a Project into the STIP

1

Complete a Project Study Report (PSR)

Required before any CMA will nominate your project for STIP. Defines scope, cost range, and schedule. Caltrans PSR guidelines and templates. Typically $50–150K consultant effort. Must be complete before MTC's December endorsement deadline in odd years.

Complete 6–12 months before CMA nomination deadline

2

Submit to Your CMA

Contact CCTA (Contra Costa) or ACTC (Alameda) during their nomination window — typically September/October of odd years. Submit with PSR, cost estimate, scope, and schedule. CMA Board votes to approve and prioritize against the county share capacity.

3

MTC Assembles Bay Area RTIP

MTC compiles all county nominations, reviews for Plan Bay Area consistency and financial constraint, and adopts the Bay Area RTIP at its December Commission meeting. MTC then forwards to CTC by December 1. If all county proposals pass review, the Bay Area RTIP is submitted as submitted; CTC must accept it in its entirety or return it for revision.

4

CTC Adopts the STIP

CTC holds two public hearings and formally adopts the STIP in March of even years. Your project now has a programmatic funding commitment — but no money has moved. The STIP is a programming document, not a payment.

5

Request CTC Allocation by Phase

Submit an Allocation Request to CTC for each phase (PA&ED, PS&E, Construction). CTC votes at bimonthly meetings. Submit 30–60 days before your target meeting. Each of the three phases requires a separate CTC vote and a separate E-76 authorization.

6 CTC meetings/year — align phase milestones to the CTC calendar

6

File for E-76 (if federal funds involved)

After CTC allocation, submit your E-76 package to Caltrans District Local Assistance. E-76 must be issued before incurring any federally-reimbursable costs. Processing: 2–4 weeks for delegated projects, 6–12 weeks for full FHWA review. See the E-76 & Delivery tab for the complete sequence.

FTIP Amendment Types and Timelines

🚨

No FTIP Listing = No E-76 = No Federal Funds

Every project using any federal funds must be in the FTIP with the correct fund code, phase, fiscal year, and dollar amount before E-76 can be filed. This includes discretionary grants received directly from USDOT — even SS4A and BUILD awards require a FTIP amendment before your project can proceed. FTIP amendments take 60–90 days. Start this process within days of receiving a grant award, not months.

Amendment TypeWhat Triggers ItApproval ChainTimeline
Administrative ModificationMinor cost adjustments (≤20%), schedule shifts, minor scope clarifications within the same projectMTC staff only — no Board action required2–4 weeks
Administrative AmendmentModerate changes: fund code swaps, adding a phase, moderate cost increases, new group listingsMTC Commission vote + Caltrans review + FHWA/FTA acceptance4–8 weeks
Full AmendmentNew project listings, major scope changes, large cost increases — requires public notice and comment periodMTC Commission vote + Caltrans approval + FHWA/FTA approval + 30-day public comment10–16 weeks
Post-Award Delivery

E-76 Authorization & the Reimbursement Cycle

Grant award and project delivery are two completely different processes. Between receiving an award letter and drawing down the first dollar of federal reimbursement is a compliance sequence that, executed out of order, permanently eliminates reimbursement eligibility for entire project phases. Here is the sequence, in full.

🚨

The One Rule That Cannot Be Broken

Never incur a cost you expect to be reimbursed with federal funds before the E-76 authorization date. Pre-authorization costs are permanently ineligible — no exceptions, no retroactive authorization, no appeals. A consultant invoice dated the day before E-76 is ineligible. This includes staff time billed to the project. This rule catches experienced engineers every cycle.

The E-76 Sequence

1

Five Prerequisites Before Filing

All five must be in place before Caltrans District Local Assistance will process your E-76: (1) active Local Agency-State Master Agreement, (2) project in FTIP with correct fund code and phase, (3) CTC allocation received (for state-administered programs), (4) environmental clearance (CEQA + NEPA for federal projects) appropriate to the phase, (5) right-of-way certification (construction phase only).

Missing any one = E-76 cannot be processed

2

Submit E-76 Package to Your DLAE

Submit to your Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE): completed E-76 form, FTIP project listing printout, environmental clearance, R/W certification (CON phase only), and current Master Agreement. Incomplete packages restart the clock — submit as a complete package.

3

Caltrans Reviews — Delegated or Full FHWA

Most routine local agency projects are processed under Caltrans' FHWA delegation. Delegated: 2–4 weeks. Full FHWA review (complex, large, or high-risk): 6–12 weeks additional. Track your request via the Caltrans E-76 Status Report.

4

E-76 Issued — Date Is Everything

The date on the E-76 is your obligation date and the earliest date any reimbursable cost can be incurred. Keep this document permanently — you'll reference it on every invoice and every audit. Each phase (PE, RW, CON) requires a separate E-76; a PE authorization does not cover construction costs.

Reference the E-76 date on every single reimbursement invoice

5

Federal Procurement Compliance from Day One

All procurement after E-76 must comply: (1) DBE goal established and documented before any contract award, (2) Buy America/BABA certification for iron, steel, and manufactured products, (3) Davis-Bacon prevailing wages on construction contracts over $2,000 (wage determinations in all bid documents), (4) 2 CFR Part 200 competitive bidding for consultant contracts.

DBE program must exist before any contract award — not after

6

Submit Reimbursement Invoices to Caltrans Local Assistance

City pays contractors from city funds first. Submit invoices to Caltrans DLAE with: paid invoices, certified payrolls (Davis-Bacon), DBE participation forms (CEM-2402), and progress report. Submit monthly maximum, quarterly minimum. Caltrans reviews in 30–60 days. Budget a 60–120 day cash flow gap between city payment and federal reimbursement — this is not optional to plan for.

7

Final Invoice & Close-Out

After construction acceptance, submit final invoice and Project Completion Report to Caltrans. Caltrans conducts a Local Agency Project Audit. Costs found ineligible must be repaid. Retain all records for minimum 3 years post-final payment. Obligated funds not expended within the program's obligation window lapse — typically 3 years from the fiscal year of apportionment.

Record retention: 3 years minimum post-final payment

💰

Reimbursement-Based Cash Flow: Plan Before You Commit

Federal and state competitive grants are reimbursement-based — your city pays first, invoices later. On a $5M project, your city can have $3–4M in outstanding receivables at peak construction before the first reimbursement check arrives. Coordinate with your Finance Director to establish a project reserve fund or short-term credit facility before committing to large federal-aid projects. The one exception: SB 1 LSRP is a direct monthly deposit, not reimbursement-based.

Key Delivery References

Caltrans · Master Reference
The authoritative reference for all federal-aid project delivery in California. Forms, checklists, DBE requirements, invoice formats, audit procedures.
Caltrans · Program-Specific
Supplement covering specific requirements for HSIP, ATP, CMAQ, STIP, and SB 1 programs. Chapter 25 covers SB 1 programs in detail.
Caltrans · Status Tracking
Real-time status of E-76 authorization requests by project. Use this to track where your package is in the Caltrans review queue.
Caltrans · Updates
Latest NOFA releases, deadline announcements, policy updates, workshop notices from Caltrans Division of Local Assistance.
CTC · Meeting Calendar
CTC meets 6 times per year. Allocation requests must be submitted 30–60 days before the target meeting. Plan all phase milestones around this calendar.
FHWA · Programs Hub
Fact sheets, apportionment notices, guidance documents, and program updates for all IIJA programs — the primary federal source of truth.
MTC · FTIP Database
MTC's database of all TIP-listed projects. Use to verify your project listing, fund codes, and programmed amounts before filing for E-76.
Federal · Grants Portal
All active federal transportation grant NOFOs from USDOT, FHWA, FTA, and NHTSA. Set up alerts for your programs of interest.